
Original
A Comparative Study on the Outcomes of Mid-shaft to Distal Hypospadias Repair with Stented and Unstented Urethra
*Uddin MZ,1 Rajib MA,2 Khan SS,3 Bari AA,4 Tareq SA,5 Joarder MA,6 Sanaullah M7
- *Dr. Muhammad Zia Uddin, FCPS (Urology), Registrar, Department of Urology, National Institute of Kidney Diseases & Urology (NIKDU), Dhaka,, Bangladesh. drjia1980@gmail.com. ORCID 0009-0009-9101-7046
- Dr. Asaduzzaman Rajib, MS (Urology), Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, National Institute of Kidney Diseases & Urology (NIKDU), Dhaka, Bangladesh. ORCID 0000-001-8110-5629
- Dr. Sharif Md. Shahadat Ali Khan, MS (Urology), Medical Officer, Department of Urology, National Institute of Kidney Diseases & Urology (NIKDU), Dhaka. Bangladesh. ORCID 0009-0009-0231-3434
- Dr. AKM Akramul Bari, MS (Urology), Medical Officer, Department of Urology, National Institute of Kidney Diseases & Urology (NIKDU), Dhaka, Bangladesh. ORCID 0009-0009-3786-5925
- Dr. Shah Adiluzzaman Md. Tareq, FCPS (Urology), Assistant Registrar, Department of Urology, Dinajpur Medical College, Dinajpur, Bangladesh. ORCID 0009-0001-4283-6012
- Dr. Abdul Baten Joarder, MS (Urology), Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatric Urology, National Institute of Kidney Diseases & Urology (NIKDU), Dhaka, Bangladesh. ORCID 0009-0000-0077-9614
- Dr. Sanaullah, MS (Urology), Resident Surgeon, Department of Urology, National Institute of Kidney Diseases & Urology (NIKDU), Dhaka, Bangladesh. ORCID 0009-0006-3269-0597
*For correspondence
Abstract
Background: The role of catheter or stent placement for urinary diversion in mid-shaft to distal hypospadias repair remains controversial. Thus, the decision depends on the individual surgeon’s preference and there has been little scientific evidence behind the choice.
Objective: To determine whether the presence or absence of a catheter affects postoperative complications and evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a non-catheter repair.
Methods: This quasi experimental study was carried out from December 2018 to
November 2023 at Department of Urology of National Institute of Kidney Diseases &
Urology, Dhaka. A total of 140 patients were purposively assigned with mid-shaft to coronal
hypospadias. They were grouped into 2 groups, 70 patients in each group. Patients in
group A underwent stented hypospadias repair, group B underwent unstented repair. Variables were type of hypospadias, age at repair, stent usage, and complications of hypospadias repair. Relative risk was determined, and a P-value less than 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
Results: No significant statistical differences were found in the parameters measured in either group. Some early complications included urinary retention requiring urethral catheter insertion occurred in 2 patients, bleeding in 2 unstented repair patients, and swelling of the penis, dysuria in 7 unstented repair patients, all of which were managed conservatively. In terms of late complications, out of the 115 patients assessed (56 in the stented repair group and 59 in the unstented repair group), 21 patients (18.26%) developed urethro-cutaneous fistula, with 11 (19.64%) in the stented repair group and 10 (16.95%) in the unstented repair group which showed no significant difference (P = 0.81, RR = 0.86). Meatal stenosis occurred in 5 patients (1 stented repair, 4 unstented repair), with statistically non-significant difference between the groups (P = 0.36, RR = 3.8), and glans dehiscence occurred in 8 patients (3 stented repair, 5 unstented repair) with no significant difference observed (P = 0.71, RR = 1.58).
Conclusion: No significant differences were detected in short-term complications observed between hypospadias repairs with and without stenting. However, in long-term outcomes, higher relative risk for the occurrence of meatal stenosis in unstented hypospadias repair procedures.
[Shaheed Syed Nazrul Islam Med Col J 2026, July; 11 (2):105-111]
DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.69699/ssnimcj.2026.11.2.2
